<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Microsoft and PHP</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.calevans.com/2009/05/05/microsoft-and-php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.calevans.com/2009/05/05/microsoft-and-php/</link> <description>Lint I find in my mind&#039;s belly-button.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:10:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: benivolent</title><link>http://blog.calevans.com/2009/05/05/microsoft-and-php/comment-page-1/#comment-65260</link> <dc:creator>benivolent</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 08:59:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.calevans.com/?p=555#comment-65260</guid> <description>It would be interesting to see who choose linux for stability rather than performance. Stability and performance are two different topics.....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to see who choose linux for stability rather than performance. Stability and performance are two different topics&#8230;..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dvaknheo</title><link>http://blog.calevans.com/2009/05/05/microsoft-and-php/comment-page-1/#comment-65173</link> <dc:creator>dvaknheo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:25:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.calevans.com/?p=555#comment-65173</guid> <description>I write a Template Engine by PHP call TagFeather. and, run it in Linux+Apache( DreamHost ). It Crash! But In My local develop machine as Windows XP  + Apache  , It Work.it&#039;s  Windows is more better ? Not , I run it in other VirtualHost as Linux +Apache . It work well, just cost less than 1 second . and in My local machine it use more than 10second , as profile 20 second with xdebug !Why?  the answer is my program use  greates of Regular Expressions  , so DreamHost found it cost too more CPU and stop my program. Windows not stop it but run it cost more time compare with Linux .who want to know the detail can write to my gmail. and Tagfeather is a good work  hosted in google code but sorry just has Chinese document.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I write a Template Engine by PHP call TagFeather. and, run it in Linux+Apache( DreamHost ).<br /> It Crash!<br /> But In My local develop machine as Windows XP  + Apache  , It Work.</p><p>it&#8217;s  Windows is more better ? Not , I run it in other VirtualHost as Linux +Apache . It work well, just cost less than 1 second . and in My local machine it use more than 10second , as profile 20 second with xdebug !</p><p>Why?  the answer is my program use  greates of Regular Expressions  , so DreamHost found it cost too more CPU and stop my program. Windows not stop it but run it cost more time compare with Linux .</p><p>who want to know the detail can write to my gmail. and Tagfeather is a good work  hosted in google code but sorry just has Chinese document.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cal Evans</title><link>http://blog.calevans.com/2009/05/05/microsoft-and-php/comment-page-1/#comment-65166</link> <dc:creator>Cal Evans</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 01:31:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.calevans.com/?p=555#comment-65166</guid> <description>Hi Gerry, You, men and a bunch of other folks probably aren&#039;t interested in running Windows servers and there&#039;s not much they can do about that in the near term. As I said, I&#039;m not even considering moving to a Windows server or even deploying one for testing on the Internet. However, there are companies that have a huge investment in Windows infrastructure. Thanks to the efforts of &lt;a href=&quot;http://zend.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Zend&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://microsoft.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://php.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PHP&lt;/a&gt; now runs well on Windows and these companies can start to explore PHP as a development language.This is important to the PHP community because if these companies start looking seriously *at* PHP, they will start looking seriously *for* PHP developers.Now, maybe you don&#039;t want to work in an MS shop.; that’s ok, neither do I. However, there are 4.6 million PHP developers worldwide; I&#039;m guessing there are some that would jump at the chance. Along the same vein, I have no interest in working for an IBM i5 shop. (or whatever the heck they call it this week, it changes names faster than &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zend.com/en/products/platform/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Zend Platform&lt;/a&gt;) The fact that IBM and Zend worked hard to get PHP on i5 means that there are more opportunities than ever for PHP developers.So I don’t blame you if you don’t want to run Windows as a server platform, it’s not what you need. However, don’t begrudge those who do want to run it. It may be just what they need to get PHP introduced into their shop.Thanks for the comment! =C=</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gerry,<br /> You, men and a bunch of other folks probably aren&#8217;t interested in running Windows servers and there&#8217;s not much they can do about that in the near term. As I said, I&#8217;m not even considering moving to a Windows server or even deploying one for testing on the Internet. However, there are companies that have a huge investment in Windows infrastructure. Thanks to the efforts of <a href="http://zend.com" rel="nofollow">Zend</a> and <a href="http://microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">Microsoft</a>, <a href="http://php.net" rel="nofollow">PHP</a> now runs well on Windows and these companies can start to explore PHP as a development language.</p><p>This is important to the PHP community because if these companies start looking seriously *at* PHP, they will start looking seriously *for* PHP developers.</p><p>Now, maybe you don&#8217;t want to work in an MS shop.; that’s ok, neither do I. However, there are 4.6 million PHP developers worldwide; I&#8217;m guessing there are some that would jump at the chance. Along the same vein, I have no interest in working for an IBM i5 shop. (or whatever the heck they call it this week, it changes names faster than <a href="http://www.zend.com/en/products/platform/" rel="nofollow">Zend Platform</a>) The fact that IBM and Zend worked hard to get PHP on i5 means that there are more opportunities than ever for PHP developers.</p><p>So I don’t blame you if you don’t want to run Windows as a server platform, it’s not what you need. However, don’t begrudge those who do want to run it. It may be just what they need to get PHP introduced into their shop.</p><p>Thanks for the comment!<br /> =C=</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gerry</title><link>http://blog.calevans.com/2009/05/05/microsoft-and-php/comment-page-1/#comment-65128</link> <dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 05:43:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.calevans.com/?p=555#comment-65128</guid> <description>Ok so PHP works on windows, so what? Microsoft is finally serious about PHP, wow, all that proves is how behind they always are! Why the heck would I want to run it on windows? I battled with windows desktop OS for 14 years and only recently saw the light. Why the heck would I want to put myself through all that again? A closed system impedes development on that system and just makes everything so much harder than it needs to be, I know that now. So if you&#039;re only argument for running PHP on Windows is that it&#039;s possible to do so, then I will rightly laugh the idea and then ignore you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so PHP works on windows, so what? Microsoft is finally serious about PHP, wow, all that proves is how behind they always are! Why the heck would I want to run it on windows? I battled with windows desktop OS for 14 years and only recently saw the light. Why the heck would I want to put myself through all that again? A closed system impedes development on that system and just makes everything so much harder than it needs to be, I know that now. So if you&#8217;re only argument for running PHP on Windows is that it&#8217;s possible to do so, then I will rightly laugh the idea and then ignore you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daniel Egeberg</title><link>http://blog.calevans.com/2009/05/05/microsoft-and-php/comment-page-1/#comment-65123</link> <dc:creator>Daniel Egeberg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:58:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.calevans.com/?p=555#comment-65123</guid> <description>Cal,If you&#039;re interested in Microsoft and PHP, then you might want to know that we&#039;re running Q&amp;A sessions with employees from the Microsoft Open Source Technology Center on PHP Freaks. http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php/board,112.0.html http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php/topic,247098.0.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cal,</p><p>If you&#8217;re interested in Microsoft and PHP, then you might want to know that we&#8217;re running Q&amp;A sessions with employees from the Microsoft Open Source Technology Center on PHP Freaks.<br /> <a href="http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php/board,112.0.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php/board,112.0.html</a><br /> <a href="http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php/topic,247098.0.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php/topic,247098.0.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/14 queries in 0.124 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 470/478 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.calevans.com @ 2012-02-07 13:10:54 -->
