Skip to content

Flock: FireFox on Steriods? Or just FireFox with Junk in the Trunk

Dead Reader,

Flock, the “Social Browser” built on Fire Fox. It’s now in release 1.0 so I decided to try it out.  I have to say, if you use any of the “Social” website, you are going to like Flock.

Social, All in One Place, Instead of All Over The Place

The main feature of Flock is it’s tight integration with social web sites.  As i write this, I have Flock open  with a side bar with tabs for FaceBook, Twitter, Flickr and youtube. As usual, LinkedIn seems to have managed to screw themselves out of another great opportunity by refusing to create an API. Their loss not withstanding the integration with the other sites is awesome.  The sidebar allows me to see the status or changes that I would normally have to visit the site to see.  Additionally, in the case of FaceBook I can change my status and in the case of twitter, I can tweet, directly from the sidebar. Additionally, there is an “All” tab that combines all the feeds into one. Great way to get a birds eye view of what is going on and what has changed.

The handling of media is great also.  When my daughter uploads pictures to her facebook account, the word “Media” under her facebook picture turns orange.  Clicking on it doesn’t open up another web page though, it opens a tab at the top and shows me her pictures. Flock truly integrates with these sites they feel like part of the browser, not just an add on or afterthought.

As much as I like my friend Ed’s AIR application Spaz, Flock has become my interface to twitter.

A Better FireFox Than FireFox?

One of the things that originally drew me to Flock was rumors that they had improved FireFox’s memory management.  Possibly because I’ve not yet installed all of my extensions that I use in FireFox but Flock is snappier, uses less memory and can stay open for days at a time without leaking memory. With FireFox, I routinely have to shut down all browsers after more than 4 hours because it starts to pause between page loading, field switching or tab switching…it gets really annoying.

Blogging Friendly

Another great feature of Flock is the blogging tool they integrate into it. I’m writing this post from the “Blog Editor” It easily integrates with any of the major blogging sites or, as in my case, WordPress. However, no matter what page you are on, your blog is just a right-click away. The right click menu contains a “blog this” menu item that brings up the blog editor ready with a link ot the page already pasted in for you.


I live in a browser, it’s just the world I work in, so browser performance is very important to me. Add to it the fact that I actually save RAM by not having to run a separate twitter client as well as time and bandwidth by not having to check the sites I participate in regularly to keep current and I have to say that Flock is really a winner. If you participate in any of the socal networks mentioned or you have been having performance issues with FireFox, I highly recommend you take a look at Flock.

Until next time,

Tags: flock, firefox, youtube, facebook, flickr, blogging, linkedin, review, browsing

4 thoughts on “Flock: FireFox on Steriods? Or just FireFox with Junk in the Trunk

  1. (x) reasons you’re a real geek: I saw your twitter update that you posted this, and I thought you were going to review the php flock() function ;)

  2. Hey how exactly this Flock has to be used……hope there isn’t too much of bandwidth thats affected cause i work….& in office its not allowed. Just a piece of information thought will be useful. Linkedin can be access over the phone without internet but on sms……

  3. Wow — I knew I’d learn something shadowing Cal. I love Flock so far. Anyone tried me.dium yet? Does it look good or scary — or both?

  4. @stefan,


    Yes, you can use you access some of your linkedin features but to date, they have not released an API that I can use to access *my* data stored on their system. Only being able to use my data in ways that they feel are important makes LinkedIn much less useful to me. I wish they would concentrate less on features like profile pictures and questions and more on things like an API.

    Hmmm…had not seen this yet. I’ll have to take a look at it. Thanks!


Comments are closed.