Skip to content

Zend’s new namespace converter

Dear Reader,

Short version

If you have a library of code you want to convert to PHP 5.3 namespaces and it follows the Zend class naming standard, this tool will do the grunt work for you. Clone the repo using git or just grab the archive and start playing with it.

The fun version

RALPH! That’s how these conversations usually start. I can feel Ralph cringe over IM every time I do that too. (And I can see Matthew smiling reading this because it used to be MATTHEW!) Ralph Schindler is one of 2 full-time Zend employees whose job it is to work on the Zend Framework. (Yeah, awesome job if you can get it!) Ralph works on a lost of stuff but my favorite is Zend_Tool. Every time Ralph releases a new version of Zend_Tool, he and I end up having an extended debugging session making sure that my zf twitter client still works.


Namespaces in PHP

Dear Reader,

I don’t often comment on PHP directly in my blog as I have other outlets for that. However, Elizabeth Smith brought this post to my attention yesterday in the #phpc chatroom and I really think it deserves a mention by any and all interested in this topic. (Also, this post is on my personal blog and should not in any way be considered a corporate endorsement for any person or idea discussed…you have been warned.)

If you don’t follow the PHP internals mailing list, then you may not know of the storm that has been playing out in it regarding namespaces in PHP 5.x or PHP 6. Don’t worry, if you don’t follow it, unless you are qualified to participate in the discussion, it’s really not that interesting. The important fact is that there has been for some time now, a very passionate discussion over how namespaces should be implemented in PHP, when they should be implemented and should they even be implemented in PHP.

Deric Rethans even wrote an interesting and detailed message titled “RFC Dropping Namespaces“, which shows you how far this conversation has gone.

To the point of this post, on Thursday, Greg Beaver wrote a rebuttal to Derick’s post. Not only did he address all of Derick’s concerns but he suggested how they could be addressed technically. (Not being a regular follower of internals, it is only by anecdotal evidence that I understand that it is not common for someone to rebut AND suggest a solution at the same time.)

Kudos to Greg for what seems to be a comprehensive and viable solution. (At least from my limited understanding of the problem space.) If you are at all interested in the future of PHP, I suggest you go take a look at the discussion as it may affect you. (Please though, no +1 posts and unless you are ready to show a patch to support your idea of how it should be implemented, please don’t post your idea)

Until next time,